4 Chilanzar Ave, Tashkent 100115

 info@uzrd.uz

Villages Ranking

Villages are prioritized for participation in the Rural Infrastructure Development Project based on the following criteria

1. Villages that have not benefited from the Obod Qishloq, Obod Markaz, or Obod Mahalla state programs.

2. Villages that are remote from the district center. Remoteness can vary depending on geography (e.g., rugged or mountainous areas), accessibility (e.g., roads, transportation), and climate (e.g., the presence of natural hazards).

3. Villages in which a relatively high percentage of households lack uninterrupted and reliable tap drinking water (compared to other villages in the district that have no state program and are remote).

Village Score System
Remoteness from district center Access to drinking water Score
greater than 20km 0-20 percent of households with uninterrupted access 5
15-20km 20-40 percent of households with uninterrupted access 4
10-15km 40-60 percent of households with uninterrupted access 3
5-10km 60-80 percent of households with uninterrupted access 2
less than 5km 80-100 percent of households with uninterrupted access 1
Villages scoring and ranking by year of project implementation
# Name Remoteness score Water score Total Year of implementation
1 Kurik 1 1 2 2021
2 Poromon 5 2 7 2022
3 Oksuv Govazon 5 2 7 2022
4 Govazon 5 2 7 2022
5 Sokhil 5 2 7 2022
6 Nov 5 2 7 2022
7 Bogiston 5 2 7 2022
8 Khujashurkent 4 3 7 2022
9 Yangiobod 5 2 7 2022
10 Zarkent 5 3 8 2021
11 Madaniyat MCA 5 3 8 2021
12 Oktepa 5 3 8 2021
13 Birlik 5 3 8 2021
14 Urta 4 4 8 2021
15 Oq Tom 5 3 8 2021
16 Chongbagish 4 5 9 2021
17 Khadikent 5 4 9 2021
18 Yangibogiston 5 4 9 2021